Congressional Anti-Semitism Resolution

The US House of Representatives resolution condemning anti-Semitism only illustrates the depth of the race hatred that Jews hold toward non-Jews.  Of course, not all Jews are virulent racists, but many are.  The resolution was edited to condemn all sorts of racism and discrimination, but it begins with a number of condemnations of anti-Semitism and emphasizes it throughout.  It remains a Jewish attack on non-Jews.  It is a Jewish declaration of war against non-Jews.

The following is a link to H. Res. 183 condemning anti-Semitism, etc.

https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20190304/BILLS-116hres183-SUSv1.pdf

While the House attempted to clean up the final version of the resolution, it is clearly a Jewish document aimed at vilifying non-Jews.  Its claim to support various minorities other than Jews is just window dressing.  It is really just Jewish congressmen attacking Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, trying to intimidate her into not criticizing Jews in the future.  It is a demonstration of the power of Jews in Congress, and of course of Jewish pressure groups such as AIPAC.

According to the New York Times:

The resolution was the product of a deal brokered by Representative Jerrold Nadler, Democrat of New York, whose district has the highest Jewish population of any congressional district; Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, a leading Jewish progressive; and Representative Cedric L. Richmond, Democrat of Louisiana and a former chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/07/us/politics/ilhan-omar-anti-semitism-vote.html

The House attack on President Trump is being led by two Jews, Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler, who have a racist agenda to diminish the power of white people – represented at the moment by Donald Trump – and to increase the power of Jewish people.  Schiff and Nadler chair the two House committees that are most directly attacking Trump: the Intelligence Committee and the Judiciary Committee.  The fact that the New York Times mentions Nadler as one of the brokers of the House resolution makes it clear that he is motivated by racial animus.

I have been worried that Jews may be trying to take over the United States government, but I have kept telling my self that it’s crazy.  However, it appears that at least twice in fairly recent history they have been involved in overthrowing governments.  Jews were significantly involved in the overthrow of the Russian imperial government of the Czars in the early 1900s.  Marx and Trotsky were two notable participants, but there were a number of lower level Jews, too, although they eventually lost out to Lenin and other non-Jewish Communists.  Then in the 1930s after World War I, the Jews became very powerful in Germany and Austria.  The Jews were perceived as the imposers of the rigorous reparations demanded from Germany because of the war.  Many Jews were becoming wealthy while average, ethnic Germans were suffering under horrendous inflation and other economic deprivation.  The movie “Woman in Gold” shows a Jewish family with paintings by old masters, a Stradivarius cello, and the Woman in Gold painting by Gustav Klimt that gave the movie its title.  If you follow all the lawsuits that have been filed by Jewish families for art stolen by the Nazis, it appears that Jewish families in Germany owned much of the art that is now so valuable that it became part of museum collections rather than being owned by individuals.  German Jewish families owned much of the most valuable art in the world while ethnic Germans were struggling to feed themselves, buying a loaf of bread with a wheelbarrow of cash.   Jews sat atop an unequal economy much more exaggerated than the one we currently face in the US.  Meanwhile other Jews, such as Rosa Luxemburg, became powerful in the German government, frightening many Germans who believed that German would be forced to follow the Russian model into a Communist government.  Unfortunately, the fact that ordinary Germans saw Jews as rich, cruel oppressors let them to accept the Nazi government that eventually led to the Holocaust.

The House resolution was clearly intended to intimidate Congresswoman Ilhan Omar and prevent her from exercising her First Amendment right of free speech, even as a member of Congress.  It smacks of fascism.  Jews have attacked her particularly for her tweet that “It’s all about the Benjamins, baby,” saying that it repeated an anti-Semitic trope that Jews influence government through money.  Unfortunately, the Jews reinforce these “tropes” by doing the same things over and over again.  Speaker Nancy Pelosi agreed to this undemocratic resolution because the Democratic Party is very dependent on Jewish political contributions.  She and the resolution are living proof that this Jewish characteristic described by Omar is alive and well.  The Jews in Congress should have remembered Shakespeare’s warning in Hamlet, “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”  The resolution is itself evidence that the Jews are guilty as charged.

Rather than reacting with vitriolic anger, the Jews could have factually refuted Omar’s assertion, if it is not true.  The fact that they did not respond factually tends to indicate that the allegations are true.  AIPAC is a lobby for a foreign government.  Jews do have divided loyalty.  Just one example: NYT columnist David Brooks’ son fought in the Israeli military.  Another example is Sheldon Adelson’s enormous campaign contributions to assure that US foreign policy support Israel, about $100 million to support Trump because of his strong support for Israel.  Two respecting political scientists have written a book about AIPAC and its powerful influence on foreign policy The Israeli Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt.  The Jews in Congress and their lobbyist supporters chose not to respond to the factual allegations made by Omar, but just to vilify her personally.  Again, that lends credence to the truth of her accusations.

Why is it that Jews never admit that they might need to change?  If anyone criticizes a Jew, the immediate response to vilify the critic as an anti-Semite, not to look at whether there might be some justification for the criticism.  Jews believe they are perfect, God’s chosen race, and that anyone who criticizes them is an evil racist.

Fortunately, the Jews still perceive that they need America.  They need American weapons to defend themselves against the Arabs who surround them.  America is the big brother whom the Jews threaten to bring in and beat up their neighbors if there is trouble in the neighborhood.  This is the main concern of AIPAC and the Jews in Congress.

In tandem with this security objective, Jewish financiers are engineering a hostile takeover of the United States economy.  Jews have gone from being minor players in the US economy when the US was formed, to being dominant today, constituting almost half of the Forbes 400 richest Americans, and controlling many of the largest corporations, such as Facebook, Google, Goldman Sachs, and many others.  There are non-Jews like Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett, and several Walmart Walton family members near the top of the list, but many others are Jewish, led by Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison and Larry Page, and including Michael Bloomberg, Sergey Brin, Sheldon Adelson, and Steve Balmer, among many others.  There were Jews in Forbes’ earlier lists, but not nearly as many.  In the 1985 list the first Jews were two Newhouse family members and included the Annenbergs and other wealthy Jews.

Jews are consolidating their political power and they increase their financial clout.  They constitute about ten percent of the Senate, including Schumer as minority leader, and hold three powerful committee chairmanships in the House.  Back during the first Bush administration during the 1990s, there was huge opposition to the outsized role of WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants) in the government and society.  Now the WASPs are pretty much gone.  Whether they self-destructed or Jews greased the skids for them, I don’t know, but they are gone.  At least part of the reason is that WASPs did not have enough children to keep their line alive.  In any case they faded out, and Jews moved into the vacuum.

Currently it’s not mainly Jews who are calling for America to turn to socialism, although Bernie Sanders is one of the leaders.  Americans seem less concerned about following Russia down the rathole of Communism than Germans were in the 1930s, but in the past, Jews have been connected to this movement, ironically as some rich Jews have become the biggest beneficiaries of American capitalism.

For me, the fascist House resolution condemning Ilhan Omar is a warning sign that Jews are increasing in power and are not afraid to demonstrate their strength.  The Jews should have responded civilly and reasonably, not with such hatred.  I see rough times ahead for non-Jewish Americans.

 

 

Advertisements

Manafort on Election Polling

A New York Times article,  “Russian Spy or Hustling Political Operative? The Enigmatic Figure at the Heart of Mueller’s Inquiry” contains almost no information about the issue it is supposed to deal with: The Trump campaign passing treasonous information to Russian intelligence officers.  There is no doubt that Manafort is a bad man who sold his political expertise to some bad people in Ukraine.  After lots of useless background criticizing Manafort and Kilimnik, the article finally gets to the point of what the Trump campaign disclosed:

Around the time of Mr. Kilimnik’s trip to the United States in spring 2016, Mr. Manafort directed Mr. Gates to transfer some polling data to Mr. Kilimnik, including public polling and some developed by a private polling company working for the campaign, according to a person with knowledge of the arrangement.

Mr. Manafort asked Mr. Gates to tell Mr. Kilimnik to pass the data to Mr. Lyovochkin and Mr. Akhmetov, the person said. Representatives for both Mr. Lyovochkin and Mr. Akhmetov said they neither requested nor received the data, and would have had no use for it.

Mr. Mueller’s team has focused on what appears to have been another discussion about polling data in New York on Aug. 2, 2016. A partly redacted court transcript suggests that Mr. Gates, who entered a plea agreement with the special counsel that requires his cooperation, may have told prosecutors that Mr. Manafort had walked Mr. Kilimnik through detailed polling data at a meeting that day in the cigar lounge of the Grand Havana Room in Manhattan.

By these standards, John King of CNN could be convicted of whatever Manafort is supposed to be convicted of.  Sharing of polling data does not appear to me to be a crime, whether shared with a Russian or anybody else.  This whole thing appears to be based in part on Jewish racial prejudices against Russians. Jews were discriminated against in Russia for a thousand years, and are now getting their revenge.  The Jewish family that owns the New York Times, the Sulzbergers, is moderate, but they and the Jews they employ can’t help but be prejudiced by their Jewish history.  The same is true for Adam Schiff and the other Jews in Congress.

Even the meeting in Trump Tower that Democrats characterize as being the most treasonous, between Trump Junior and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, was also about a Jewish issue, the Magnitsky Act.  The Magnitsky Act was pushed through Congress by Jewish investor Bill Broder, who made billions investing in undervalued Russian assets until he got crossed up with the Russian government.  The Magnitsky Act to some extent replaced the Jackson-Vanik amendment, which had helped millions of Jews escape the Soviet Union, but which became illegal under new WTO rules.

Who knows what Thursday’s closed Congressional testimony by Michael Cohen before the House Intelligence Committee will bring, but a Jewish Committee Chairman, Adam Schiff, will be questioning a Jewish witness, Michael Cohen, who also has many ties to the Ukrainian Jewish community.  It will be a Jewish show.  Before testifying before Schiff, Cohen will testify privately before the Senate Intelligence Committee today, and publicly before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday.

New York Review Article on Jewish Communism

The article on “The Fake Threat of Jewish Communism” in the New York Review of books indicates that the threat is fake, as the title states, but it also confirms that this is a big, continuing issue, one that has been debated in the U.S. for over one hundred years.  Henry Ford was very concerned about this issue in the 1920s in his articles about Judaism, collected in “The International Jew.”  Ford was writing shortly after the Russian revolution, while there were widespread concerns that Bolshevism would spread to Western Europe and possibly to the U.S.

Russian Communism has failed, and Putin has become the new Czar.  As a result, Jews have taken up a new anti-Russian campaign in the U.S.  This has mainly taken the form of Jewish attacks on Trump for his ties to Russia during the 2016 election.  The Jewish hatred of ethnic, Christian Russians has morphed into a campaign to impeach Trump for openly praising Putin and Russia.  The campaign has been joined by Jewish politicians and Jewish media.  According to Wikipedia there are eight Jews in the Senate, plus Michael Bennett, whose mother was a Holocaust survivor.  Wikipedia says 8.4% of the US. House is Jewish.  The Pew Research Center says there are 34 Jews in the House.  Of these, however, four are chairmen of important committees that have made a point of attacking President Trump.

Adam Schiff, the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee has been particularly outspoken in his criticism of President Trump.  Tom Steyer, the billionaire, is half Jewish and is leading the independent crusade to impeach Trump.